Forget Spotify algorithms or, shudder, the mass media, nowadays young people are discovering their new favourite tunes layered under bedroom makeup tutorials or films of body-popping GCSE students. Yet since the app’s global launch in 2018, TikTok has carved out another reputation: as a musical tastemaker. The bill was introduced in the Senate.M ention of the video-sharing platform TikTok brings to mind two things: a) the endless torrent of spellbindingly inane 15-second clips created by its gargantuan teen userbase, and b) its ironclad ability to make anyone born before the turn of the millennium feel like a bewildered OAP. And Ocasio-Cortez is in the House of Representatives. The RESTRICT Act has been proposed but not voted on. 400+ of your Reps voted for it,” wrote one. $250,000 fine for using a VPN to access content. 686) is her most based and important vote yet. “AOC one of 7 no votes on the RESTRICT Act (S. Somehow, though, Ocasio-Cortez got mixed with misinformation about the RESTRICT Act, fooling some crypto bros into believing she worked to stop the looming bill. Congress, she said, needs to “protect Americans from this kind of egregious data harvesting” does not have nationwide data and privacy protections. In the video, Ocasio-Cortez pointed the focus back at social media companies in general, and how the U.S. thoughts on TikTok… ♬ original sound – aocinthehouse Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) joined the app and released a video calling a TikTok ban “unprecedented,” saying she does not support it. Meanwhile, as the mood in Congress seems to move unanimously toward a ban, Rep. critical infrastructure, or ‘interfering in, or altering the result’ of a federal election, in order to be eligible for any kind of criminal penalty … To be extremely clear, this legislation is aimed squarely at companies like Kaspersky, Huawei, and TikTok that create systemic risks to the United States’ national security-not at individual users,” a spokesperson for Warner told the Daily Dot. “Under the terms of the bill, someone must be engaged in ‘sabotage or subversion’ of American communications technology products and services, creating ‘catastrophic effects’ on U.S. A spokesperson for Warner explicitly said that the punishments in the bill would not be used against ordinary citizens. However, the stipulation for punishments in the bill involves violations that threaten national security and try to undermine elections, not likely intended for the average user just trying to post videos. This includes fines of up to a million dollars or 20 years in jail, or both.” Remarkably, that includes VPN technology … The scary part is the potential punishment for violators. government sweeping powers to crack down on any technologies and services it sees as a threat. if you attempt to pass this Bill, you will be sealing the nail in the coffin of Freedom and expect a 80 + Million Americans to be as pissed as… /43ikHZ6Gm4- Joshua Reid March 28, 2023Īn article this morning on BeinCrypto furthered the VPN claim, saying “If passed, the new legislation will grant the U.S. □The RESTRICT ACT S 686 is a massive violation of our 4th Amendment Rights and an complete Nationalization of the internet. VPNs can help mask the location of a user, and in theory, could be used to get around a TikTok ban.Īlthough the bill doesn’t explicitly cite VPNs, it notes anyone violating the statutes of the law would face stiff penalties and that, if made law, the government would be able to use many means of monitoring internet communications to enforce it. The bill got the swift support of Biden, giving the general public the impression it might rapidly work its way through Congress.Ī provision in the bill though is causing alarm online, with users believing the RESTRICT Act would jail Americans for up to 20 years for using a Virtual Private Network (VPN). Mark Warner (D-Va.) introduced the RESTRICT Act, an effort to give President Joe Biden more leverage to force a sale of the app to a U.S. It’s been a week big week for TikTok on Capitol Hill as its CEO testified before Congress and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said he would push forward on legislation intended to ban the app.īut now, misinformation about the ban coming from Congress is swirling online, with a number of users concerned that legislation will jail people who try to circumvent it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |